Dr Roger Auster

Postdoctoral Research Associate

Alternative perspectives of the angling community on Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) reintroduction in the River Otter Beaver Trial


Journal article


Roger E. Auster, Stewart W. Barr, Richard E. Brazier
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 64(7), 2020, pp. 1252-1270


Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Auster, R. E., Barr, S. W., & Brazier, R. E. (2020). Alternative perspectives of the angling community on Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) reintroduction in the River Otter Beaver Trial. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(7), 1252–1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1816933


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Auster, Roger E., Stewart W. Barr, and Richard E. Brazier. “Alternative Perspectives of the Angling Community on Eurasian Beaver (Castor Fiber) Reintroduction in the River Otter Beaver Trial.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 64, no. 7 (2020): 1252–1270.


MLA   Click to copy
Auster, Roger E., et al. “Alternative Perspectives of the Angling Community on Eurasian Beaver (Castor Fiber) Reintroduction in the River Otter Beaver Trial.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 64, no. 7, 2020, pp. 1252–70, doi:10.1080/09640568.2020.1816933.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{roger2020a,
  title = {Alternative perspectives of the angling community on Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) reintroduction in the River Otter Beaver Trial},
  year = {2020},
  issue = {7},
  journal = {Journal of Environmental Planning and Management},
  pages = {1252-1270},
  volume = {64},
  doi = {10.1080/09640568.2020.1816933},
  author = {Auster, Roger E. and Barr, Stewart W. and Brazier, Richard E.}
}

Abstract

Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) reintroduction is taking place in England with potential benefits for flood alleviation and biodiversity; however there is also opposition. One area of controversy relates to fish and fishing. A previous meta-analysis of research into beaver-fish relationships found perceived benefits of beavers amongst fish and beaver “experts” included increased fish abundance and productivity, whilst perceived negatives included impeded fish passage and reduced spawning habitat availability. We further this understanding using Q-Methodology (a social science technique) to reveal three nuanced and contrasting perspectives that exist amongst the angling community in the catchment of a trial reintroduction. Due to a conflict potential between groups, we suggest management themes to help reduce this where reintroduction occurs: open, cross-sectoral dialogue about research into beaver-fish relationships and management; a management strategy which supports ecosystem benefits whilst providing a sense of empowerment for individuals to respond to negative impacts.


Share


Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in